| <html> |
| <head> |
| <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII"> |
| <title>Discussion</title> |
| <link rel="stylesheet" href="../../../../../doc/src/boostbook.css" type="text/css"> |
| <meta name="generator" content="DocBook XSL Stylesheets V1.78.1"> |
| <link rel="home" href="../index.html" title="Chapter 1. Boost.Optional"> |
| <link rel="up" href="../index.html" title="Chapter 1. Boost.Optional"> |
| <link rel="prev" href="quick_start.html" title="Quick Start"> |
| <link rel="next" href="development.html" title="Development"> |
| </head> |
| <body bgcolor="white" text="black" link="#0000FF" vlink="#840084" alink="#0000FF"> |
| <table cellpadding="2" width="100%"><tr> |
| <td valign="top"><img alt="Boost C++ Libraries" width="277" height="86" src="../../../../../boost.png"></td> |
| <td align="center"><a href="../../../../../index.html">Home</a></td> |
| <td align="center"><a href="../../../../../libs/libraries.htm">Libraries</a></td> |
| <td align="center"><a href="http://www.boost.org/users/people.html">People</a></td> |
| <td align="center"><a href="http://www.boost.org/users/faq.html">FAQ</a></td> |
| <td align="center"><a href="../../../../../more/index.htm">More</a></td> |
| </tr></table> |
| <hr> |
| <div class="spirit-nav"> |
| <a accesskey="p" href="quick_start.html"><img src="../../../../../doc/src/images/prev.png" alt="Prev"></a><a accesskey="u" href="../index.html"><img src="../../../../../doc/src/images/up.png" alt="Up"></a><a accesskey="h" href="../index.html"><img src="../../../../../doc/src/images/home.png" alt="Home"></a><a accesskey="n" href="development.html"><img src="../../../../../doc/src/images/next.png" alt="Next"></a> |
| </div> |
| <div class="section"> |
| <div class="titlepage"><div><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both"> |
| <a name="boost_optional.discussion"></a><a class="link" href="discussion.html" title="Discussion">Discussion</a> |
| </h2></div></div></div> |
| <p> |
| Consider these functions which should return a value but which might not have |
| a value to return: |
| </p> |
| <div class="itemizedlist"><ul class="itemizedlist" style="list-style-type: disc; "> |
| <li class="listitem"> |
| (A) <code class="computeroutput"><span class="keyword">double</span> <span class="identifier">sqrt</span><span class="special">(</span><span class="keyword">double</span> <span class="identifier">n</span> <span class="special">);</span></code> |
| </li> |
| <li class="listitem"> |
| (B) <code class="computeroutput"><span class="keyword">char</span> <span class="identifier">get_async_input</span><span class="special">();</span></code> |
| </li> |
| <li class="listitem"> |
| (C) <code class="computeroutput"><span class="identifier">point</span> <span class="identifier">polygon</span><span class="special">::</span><span class="identifier">get_any_point_effectively_inside</span><span class="special">();</span></code> |
| </li> |
| </ul></div> |
| <p> |
| There are different approaches to the issue of not having a value to return. |
| </p> |
| <p> |
| A typical approach is to consider the existence of a valid return value as |
| a postcondition, so that if the function cannot compute the value to return, |
| it has either undefined behavior (and can use assert in a debug build) or uses |
| a runtime check and throws an exception if the postcondition is violated. This |
| is a reasonable choice for example, for function (A), because the lack of a |
| proper return value is directly related to an invalid parameter (out of domain |
| argument), so it is appropriate to require the callee to supply only parameters |
| in a valid domain for execution to continue normally. |
| </p> |
| <p> |
| However, function (B), because of its asynchronous nature, does not fail just |
| because it can't find a value to return; so it is incorrect to consider such |
| a situation an error and assert or throw an exception. This function must return, |
| and somehow, must tell the callee that it is not returning a meaningful value. |
| </p> |
| <p> |
| A similar situation occurs with function (C): it is conceptually an error to |
| ask a <span class="emphasis"><em>null-area</em></span> polygon to return a point inside itself, |
| but in many applications, it is just impractical for performance reasons to |
| treat this as an error (because detecting that the polygon has no area might |
| be too expensive to be required to be tested previously), and either an arbitrary |
| point (typically at infinity) is returned, or some efficient way to tell the |
| callee that there is no such point is used. |
| </p> |
| <p> |
| There are various mechanisms to let functions communicate that the returned |
| value is not valid. One such mechanism, which is quite common since it has |
| zero or negligible overhead, is to use a special value which is reserved to |
| communicate this. Classical examples of such special values are <code class="computeroutput"><span class="identifier">EOF</span></code>, <code class="computeroutput"><span class="identifier">string</span><span class="special">::</span><span class="identifier">npos</span></code>, points |
| at infinity, etc... |
| </p> |
| <p> |
| When those values exist, i.e. the return type can hold all meaningful values |
| <span class="emphasis"><em>plus</em></span> the <span class="emphasis"><em>signal</em></span> value, this mechanism |
| is quite appropriate and well known. Unfortunately, there are cases when such |
| values do not exist. In these cases, the usual alternative is either to use |
| a wider type, such as <code class="computeroutput"><span class="keyword">int</span></code> in place |
| of <code class="computeroutput"><span class="keyword">char</span></code>; or a compound type, such |
| as <code class="computeroutput"><span class="identifier">std</span><span class="special">::</span><span class="identifier">pair</span><span class="special"><</span><span class="identifier">point</span><span class="special">,</span><span class="keyword">bool</span><span class="special">></span></code>. |
| </p> |
| <p> |
| Returning a <code class="computeroutput"><span class="identifier">std</span><span class="special">::</span><span class="identifier">pair</span><span class="special"><</span><span class="identifier">T</span><span class="special">,</span><span class="keyword">bool</span><span class="special">></span></code>, thus attaching a boolean flag to the result |
| which indicates if the result is meaningful, has the advantage that can be |
| turned into a consistent idiom since the first element of the pair can be whatever |
| the function would conceptually return. For example, the last two functions |
| could have the following interface: |
| </p> |
| <pre class="programlisting"><span class="identifier">std</span><span class="special">::</span><span class="identifier">pair</span><span class="special"><</span><span class="keyword">char</span><span class="special">,</span><span class="keyword">bool</span><span class="special">></span> <span class="identifier">get_async_input</span><span class="special">();</span> |
| <span class="identifier">std</span><span class="special">::</span><span class="identifier">pair</span><span class="special"><</span><span class="identifier">point</span><span class="special">,</span><span class="keyword">bool</span><span class="special">></span> <span class="identifier">polygon</span><span class="special">::</span><span class="identifier">get_any_point_effectively_inside</span><span class="special">();</span> |
| </pre> |
| <p> |
| These functions use a consistent interface for dealing with possibly nonexistent |
| results: |
| </p> |
| <pre class="programlisting"><span class="identifier">std</span><span class="special">::</span><span class="identifier">pair</span><span class="special"><</span><span class="identifier">point</span><span class="special">,</span><span class="keyword">bool</span><span class="special">></span> <span class="identifier">p</span> <span class="special">=</span> <span class="identifier">poly</span><span class="special">.</span><span class="identifier">get_any_point_effectively_inside</span><span class="special">();</span> |
| <span class="keyword">if</span> <span class="special">(</span> <span class="identifier">p</span><span class="special">.</span><span class="identifier">second</span> <span class="special">)</span> |
| <span class="identifier">flood_fill</span><span class="special">(</span><span class="identifier">p</span><span class="special">.</span><span class="identifier">first</span><span class="special">);</span> |
| </pre> |
| <p> |
| However, not only is this quite a burden syntactically, it is also error prone |
| since the user can easily use the function result (first element of the pair) |
| without ever checking if it has a valid value. |
| </p> |
| <p> |
| Clearly, we need a better idiom. |
| </p> |
| </div> |
| <table xmlns:rev="http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~gregod/boost/tools/doc/revision" width="100%"><tr> |
| <td align="left"></td> |
| <td align="right"><div class="copyright-footer">Copyright © 2003-2007 Fernando Luis Cacciola Carballal<br>Copyright © 2014 Andrzej Krzemieński<p> |
| Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0. (See accompanying |
| file LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at <a href="http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt" target="_top">http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt</a>) |
| </p> |
| </div></td> |
| </tr></table> |
| <hr> |
| <div class="spirit-nav"> |
| <a accesskey="p" href="quick_start.html"><img src="../../../../../doc/src/images/prev.png" alt="Prev"></a><a accesskey="u" href="../index.html"><img src="../../../../../doc/src/images/up.png" alt="Up"></a><a accesskey="h" href="../index.html"><img src="../../../../../doc/src/images/home.png" alt="Home"></a><a accesskey="n" href="development.html"><img src="../../../../../doc/src/images/next.png" alt="Next"></a> |
| </div> |
| </body> |
| </html> |