Austin Schuh | 0cbef62 | 2015-09-06 17:34:52 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | // Copyright 2005, Google Inc. |
| 2 | // All rights reserved. |
| 3 | // |
| 4 | // Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without |
| 5 | // modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are |
| 6 | // met: |
| 7 | // |
| 8 | // * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright |
| 9 | // notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. |
| 10 | // * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above |
| 11 | // copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer |
| 12 | // in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the |
| 13 | // distribution. |
| 14 | // * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its |
| 15 | // contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from |
| 16 | // this software without specific prior written permission. |
| 17 | // |
| 18 | // THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS |
| 19 | // "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT |
| 20 | // LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR |
| 21 | // A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT |
| 22 | // OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, |
| 23 | // SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT |
| 24 | // LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, |
| 25 | // DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY |
| 26 | // THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT |
| 27 | // (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE |
| 28 | // OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. |
| 29 | // |
| 30 | // The purpose of this file is to generate Google Test output under |
| 31 | // various conditions. The output will then be verified by |
Austin Schuh | 889ac43 | 2018-10-29 22:57:02 -0700 | [diff] [blame^] | 32 | // googletest-output-test.py to ensure that Google Test generates the |
Austin Schuh | 0cbef62 | 2015-09-06 17:34:52 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 33 | // desired messages. Therefore, most tests in this file are MEANT TO |
| 34 | // FAIL. |
Austin Schuh | 0cbef62 | 2015-09-06 17:34:52 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 35 | |
| 36 | #include "gtest/gtest-spi.h" |
| 37 | #include "gtest/gtest.h" |
Austin Schuh | 0cbef62 | 2015-09-06 17:34:52 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 38 | #include "src/gtest-internal-inl.h" |
Austin Schuh | 0cbef62 | 2015-09-06 17:34:52 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 39 | |
| 40 | #include <stdlib.h> |
| 41 | |
Austin Schuh | 889ac43 | 2018-10-29 22:57:02 -0700 | [diff] [blame^] | 42 | #if _MSC_VER |
| 43 | GTEST_DISABLE_MSC_WARNINGS_PUSH_(4127 /* conditional expression is constant */) |
| 44 | #endif // _MSC_VER |
| 45 | |
Austin Schuh | 0cbef62 | 2015-09-06 17:34:52 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 46 | #if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE |
| 47 | using testing::ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter; |
| 48 | using testing::TestPartResultArray; |
| 49 | |
| 50 | using testing::internal::Notification; |
| 51 | using testing::internal::ThreadWithParam; |
| 52 | #endif |
| 53 | |
| 54 | namespace posix = ::testing::internal::posix; |
| 55 | |
| 56 | // Tests catching fatal failures. |
| 57 | |
| 58 | // A subroutine used by the following test. |
| 59 | void TestEq1(int x) { |
| 60 | ASSERT_EQ(1, x); |
| 61 | } |
| 62 | |
| 63 | // This function calls a test subroutine, catches the fatal failure it |
| 64 | // generates, and then returns early. |
| 65 | void TryTestSubroutine() { |
| 66 | // Calls a subrountine that yields a fatal failure. |
| 67 | TestEq1(2); |
| 68 | |
| 69 | // Catches the fatal failure and aborts the test. |
| 70 | // |
| 71 | // The testing::Test:: prefix is necessary when calling |
| 72 | // HasFatalFailure() outside of a TEST, TEST_F, or test fixture. |
| 73 | if (testing::Test::HasFatalFailure()) return; |
| 74 | |
| 75 | // If we get here, something is wrong. |
| 76 | FAIL() << "This should never be reached."; |
| 77 | } |
| 78 | |
| 79 | TEST(PassingTest, PassingTest1) { |
| 80 | } |
| 81 | |
| 82 | TEST(PassingTest, PassingTest2) { |
| 83 | } |
| 84 | |
| 85 | // Tests that parameters of failing parameterized tests are printed in the |
| 86 | // failing test summary. |
| 87 | class FailingParamTest : public testing::TestWithParam<int> {}; |
| 88 | |
| 89 | TEST_P(FailingParamTest, Fails) { |
| 90 | EXPECT_EQ(1, GetParam()); |
| 91 | } |
| 92 | |
| 93 | // This generates a test which will fail. Google Test is expected to print |
| 94 | // its parameter when it outputs the list of all failed tests. |
| 95 | INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(PrintingFailingParams, |
| 96 | FailingParamTest, |
| 97 | testing::Values(2)); |
| 98 | |
| 99 | static const char kGoldenString[] = "\"Line\0 1\"\nLine 2"; |
| 100 | |
| 101 | TEST(NonfatalFailureTest, EscapesStringOperands) { |
| 102 | std::string actual = "actual \"string\""; |
| 103 | EXPECT_EQ(kGoldenString, actual); |
| 104 | |
| 105 | const char* golden = kGoldenString; |
| 106 | EXPECT_EQ(golden, actual); |
| 107 | } |
| 108 | |
| 109 | TEST(NonfatalFailureTest, DiffForLongStrings) { |
| 110 | std::string golden_str(kGoldenString, sizeof(kGoldenString) - 1); |
| 111 | EXPECT_EQ(golden_str, "Line 2"); |
| 112 | } |
| 113 | |
| 114 | // Tests catching a fatal failure in a subroutine. |
| 115 | TEST(FatalFailureTest, FatalFailureInSubroutine) { |
| 116 | printf("(expecting a failure that x should be 1)\n"); |
| 117 | |
| 118 | TryTestSubroutine(); |
| 119 | } |
| 120 | |
| 121 | // Tests catching a fatal failure in a nested subroutine. |
| 122 | TEST(FatalFailureTest, FatalFailureInNestedSubroutine) { |
| 123 | printf("(expecting a failure that x should be 1)\n"); |
| 124 | |
| 125 | // Calls a subrountine that yields a fatal failure. |
| 126 | TryTestSubroutine(); |
| 127 | |
| 128 | // Catches the fatal failure and aborts the test. |
| 129 | // |
| 130 | // When calling HasFatalFailure() inside a TEST, TEST_F, or test |
| 131 | // fixture, the testing::Test:: prefix is not needed. |
| 132 | if (HasFatalFailure()) return; |
| 133 | |
| 134 | // If we get here, something is wrong. |
| 135 | FAIL() << "This should never be reached."; |
| 136 | } |
| 137 | |
| 138 | // Tests HasFatalFailure() after a failed EXPECT check. |
| 139 | TEST(FatalFailureTest, NonfatalFailureInSubroutine) { |
| 140 | printf("(expecting a failure on false)\n"); |
| 141 | EXPECT_TRUE(false); // Generates a nonfatal failure |
| 142 | ASSERT_FALSE(HasFatalFailure()); // This should succeed. |
| 143 | } |
| 144 | |
| 145 | // Tests interleaving user logging and Google Test assertions. |
| 146 | TEST(LoggingTest, InterleavingLoggingAndAssertions) { |
| 147 | static const int a[4] = { |
| 148 | 3, 9, 2, 6 |
| 149 | }; |
| 150 | |
| 151 | printf("(expecting 2 failures on (3) >= (a[i]))\n"); |
| 152 | for (int i = 0; i < static_cast<int>(sizeof(a)/sizeof(*a)); i++) { |
| 153 | printf("i == %d\n", i); |
| 154 | EXPECT_GE(3, a[i]); |
| 155 | } |
| 156 | } |
| 157 | |
| 158 | // Tests the SCOPED_TRACE macro. |
| 159 | |
| 160 | // A helper function for testing SCOPED_TRACE. |
| 161 | void SubWithoutTrace(int n) { |
| 162 | EXPECT_EQ(1, n); |
| 163 | ASSERT_EQ(2, n); |
| 164 | } |
| 165 | |
| 166 | // Another helper function for testing SCOPED_TRACE. |
| 167 | void SubWithTrace(int n) { |
| 168 | SCOPED_TRACE(testing::Message() << "n = " << n); |
| 169 | |
| 170 | SubWithoutTrace(n); |
| 171 | } |
| 172 | |
Austin Schuh | 889ac43 | 2018-10-29 22:57:02 -0700 | [diff] [blame^] | 173 | TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, AcceptedValues) { |
| 174 | SCOPED_TRACE("literal string"); |
| 175 | SCOPED_TRACE(std::string("std::string")); |
| 176 | SCOPED_TRACE(1337); // streamable type |
| 177 | const char* null_value = NULL; |
| 178 | SCOPED_TRACE(null_value); |
| 179 | |
| 180 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Just checking that all these values work fine."; |
| 181 | } |
| 182 | |
Austin Schuh | 0cbef62 | 2015-09-06 17:34:52 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 183 | // Tests that SCOPED_TRACE() obeys lexical scopes. |
| 184 | TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, ObeysScopes) { |
| 185 | printf("(expected to fail)\n"); |
| 186 | |
| 187 | // There should be no trace before SCOPED_TRACE() is invoked. |
| 188 | ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and shouldn't have a trace."; |
| 189 | |
| 190 | { |
| 191 | SCOPED_TRACE("Expected trace"); |
| 192 | // After SCOPED_TRACE(), a failure in the current scope should contain |
| 193 | // the trace. |
| 194 | ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should have a trace."; |
| 195 | } |
| 196 | |
| 197 | // Once the control leaves the scope of the SCOPED_TRACE(), there |
| 198 | // should be no trace again. |
| 199 | ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and shouldn't have a trace."; |
| 200 | } |
| 201 | |
| 202 | // Tests that SCOPED_TRACE works inside a loop. |
| 203 | TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksInLoop) { |
| 204 | printf("(expected to fail)\n"); |
| 205 | |
| 206 | for (int i = 1; i <= 2; i++) { |
| 207 | SCOPED_TRACE(testing::Message() << "i = " << i); |
| 208 | |
| 209 | SubWithoutTrace(i); |
| 210 | } |
| 211 | } |
| 212 | |
| 213 | // Tests that SCOPED_TRACE works in a subroutine. |
| 214 | TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksInSubroutine) { |
| 215 | printf("(expected to fail)\n"); |
| 216 | |
| 217 | SubWithTrace(1); |
| 218 | SubWithTrace(2); |
| 219 | } |
| 220 | |
| 221 | // Tests that SCOPED_TRACE can be nested. |
| 222 | TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, CanBeNested) { |
| 223 | printf("(expected to fail)\n"); |
| 224 | |
| 225 | SCOPED_TRACE(""); // A trace without a message. |
| 226 | |
| 227 | SubWithTrace(2); |
| 228 | } |
| 229 | |
| 230 | // Tests that multiple SCOPED_TRACEs can be used in the same scope. |
| 231 | TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, CanBeRepeated) { |
| 232 | printf("(expected to fail)\n"); |
| 233 | |
| 234 | SCOPED_TRACE("A"); |
| 235 | ADD_FAILURE() |
| 236 | << "This failure is expected, and should contain trace point A."; |
| 237 | |
| 238 | SCOPED_TRACE("B"); |
| 239 | ADD_FAILURE() |
| 240 | << "This failure is expected, and should contain trace point A and B."; |
| 241 | |
| 242 | { |
| 243 | SCOPED_TRACE("C"); |
| 244 | ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should " |
| 245 | << "contain trace point A, B, and C."; |
| 246 | } |
| 247 | |
| 248 | SCOPED_TRACE("D"); |
| 249 | ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should " |
| 250 | << "contain trace point A, B, and D."; |
| 251 | } |
| 252 | |
| 253 | #if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE |
| 254 | // Tests that SCOPED_TRACE()s can be used concurrently from multiple |
| 255 | // threads. Namely, an assertion should be affected by |
| 256 | // SCOPED_TRACE()s in its own thread only. |
| 257 | |
| 258 | // Here's the sequence of actions that happen in the test: |
| 259 | // |
| 260 | // Thread A (main) | Thread B (spawned) |
| 261 | // ===============================|================================ |
| 262 | // spawns thread B | |
| 263 | // -------------------------------+-------------------------------- |
| 264 | // waits for n1 | SCOPED_TRACE("Trace B"); |
| 265 | // | generates failure #1 |
| 266 | // | notifies n1 |
| 267 | // -------------------------------+-------------------------------- |
| 268 | // SCOPED_TRACE("Trace A"); | waits for n2 |
| 269 | // generates failure #2 | |
| 270 | // notifies n2 | |
| 271 | // -------------------------------|-------------------------------- |
| 272 | // waits for n3 | generates failure #3 |
| 273 | // | trace B dies |
| 274 | // | generates failure #4 |
| 275 | // | notifies n3 |
| 276 | // -------------------------------|-------------------------------- |
| 277 | // generates failure #5 | finishes |
| 278 | // trace A dies | |
| 279 | // generates failure #6 | |
| 280 | // -------------------------------|-------------------------------- |
| 281 | // waits for thread B to finish | |
| 282 | |
| 283 | struct CheckPoints { |
| 284 | Notification n1; |
| 285 | Notification n2; |
| 286 | Notification n3; |
| 287 | }; |
| 288 | |
| 289 | static void ThreadWithScopedTrace(CheckPoints* check_points) { |
| 290 | { |
| 291 | SCOPED_TRACE("Trace B"); |
| 292 | ADD_FAILURE() |
| 293 | << "Expected failure #1 (in thread B, only trace B alive)."; |
| 294 | check_points->n1.Notify(); |
| 295 | check_points->n2.WaitForNotification(); |
| 296 | |
| 297 | ADD_FAILURE() |
| 298 | << "Expected failure #3 (in thread B, trace A & B both alive)."; |
| 299 | } // Trace B dies here. |
| 300 | ADD_FAILURE() |
| 301 | << "Expected failure #4 (in thread B, only trace A alive)."; |
| 302 | check_points->n3.Notify(); |
| 303 | } |
| 304 | |
| 305 | TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksConcurrently) { |
| 306 | printf("(expecting 6 failures)\n"); |
| 307 | |
| 308 | CheckPoints check_points; |
| 309 | ThreadWithParam<CheckPoints*> thread(&ThreadWithScopedTrace, |
| 310 | &check_points, |
| 311 | NULL); |
| 312 | check_points.n1.WaitForNotification(); |
| 313 | |
| 314 | { |
| 315 | SCOPED_TRACE("Trace A"); |
| 316 | ADD_FAILURE() |
| 317 | << "Expected failure #2 (in thread A, trace A & B both alive)."; |
| 318 | check_points.n2.Notify(); |
| 319 | check_points.n3.WaitForNotification(); |
| 320 | |
| 321 | ADD_FAILURE() |
| 322 | << "Expected failure #5 (in thread A, only trace A alive)."; |
| 323 | } // Trace A dies here. |
| 324 | ADD_FAILURE() |
| 325 | << "Expected failure #6 (in thread A, no trace alive)."; |
| 326 | thread.Join(); |
| 327 | } |
| 328 | #endif // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE |
| 329 | |
Austin Schuh | 889ac43 | 2018-10-29 22:57:02 -0700 | [diff] [blame^] | 330 | // Tests basic functionality of the ScopedTrace utility (most of its features |
| 331 | // are already tested in SCOPED_TRACETest). |
| 332 | TEST(ScopedTraceTest, WithExplicitFileAndLine) { |
| 333 | testing::ScopedTrace trace("explicit_file.cc", 123, "expected trace message"); |
| 334 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Check that the trace is attached to a particular location."; |
| 335 | } |
| 336 | |
Austin Schuh | 0cbef62 | 2015-09-06 17:34:52 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 337 | TEST(DisabledTestsWarningTest, |
| 338 | DISABLED_AlsoRunDisabledTestsFlagSuppressesWarning) { |
| 339 | // This test body is intentionally empty. Its sole purpose is for |
| 340 | // verifying that the --gtest_also_run_disabled_tests flag |
| 341 | // suppresses the "YOU HAVE 12 DISABLED TESTS" warning at the end of |
| 342 | // the test output. |
| 343 | } |
| 344 | |
| 345 | // Tests using assertions outside of TEST and TEST_F. |
| 346 | // |
| 347 | // This function creates two failures intentionally. |
| 348 | void AdHocTest() { |
| 349 | printf("The non-test part of the code is expected to have 2 failures.\n\n"); |
| 350 | EXPECT_TRUE(false); |
| 351 | EXPECT_EQ(2, 3); |
| 352 | } |
| 353 | |
| 354 | // Runs all TESTs, all TEST_Fs, and the ad hoc test. |
| 355 | int RunAllTests() { |
| 356 | AdHocTest(); |
| 357 | return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); |
| 358 | } |
| 359 | |
| 360 | // Tests non-fatal failures in the fixture constructor. |
| 361 | class NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest : public testing::Test { |
| 362 | protected: |
| 363 | NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() { |
| 364 | printf("(expecting 5 failures)\n"); |
| 365 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #1, in the test fixture c'tor."; |
| 366 | } |
| 367 | |
| 368 | ~NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() { |
| 369 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #5, in the test fixture d'tor."; |
| 370 | } |
| 371 | |
| 372 | virtual void SetUp() { |
| 373 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #2, in SetUp()."; |
| 374 | } |
| 375 | |
| 376 | virtual void TearDown() { |
| 377 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #4, in TearDown."; |
| 378 | } |
| 379 | }; |
| 380 | |
| 381 | TEST_F(NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest, FailureInConstructor) { |
| 382 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #3, in the test body."; |
| 383 | } |
| 384 | |
| 385 | // Tests fatal failures in the fixture constructor. |
| 386 | class FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest : public testing::Test { |
| 387 | protected: |
| 388 | FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() { |
| 389 | printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n"); |
| 390 | Init(); |
| 391 | } |
| 392 | |
| 393 | ~FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() { |
| 394 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #2, in the test fixture d'tor."; |
| 395 | } |
| 396 | |
| 397 | virtual void SetUp() { |
| 398 | ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in SetUp(). " |
| 399 | << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor " |
| 400 | << "had a fatal failure."; |
| 401 | } |
| 402 | |
| 403 | virtual void TearDown() { |
| 404 | ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in TearDown(). " |
| 405 | << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor " |
| 406 | << "had a fatal failure."; |
| 407 | } |
| 408 | |
| 409 | private: |
| 410 | void Init() { |
| 411 | FAIL() << "Expected failure #1, in the test fixture c'tor."; |
| 412 | } |
| 413 | }; |
| 414 | |
| 415 | TEST_F(FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest, FailureInConstructor) { |
| 416 | ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in the test body. " |
| 417 | << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor " |
| 418 | << "had a fatal failure."; |
| 419 | } |
| 420 | |
| 421 | // Tests non-fatal failures in SetUp(). |
| 422 | class NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest : public testing::Test { |
| 423 | protected: |
| 424 | virtual ~NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest() { |
| 425 | Deinit(); |
| 426 | } |
| 427 | |
| 428 | virtual void SetUp() { |
| 429 | printf("(expecting 4 failures)\n"); |
| 430 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #1, in SetUp()."; |
| 431 | } |
| 432 | |
| 433 | virtual void TearDown() { |
| 434 | FAIL() << "Expected failure #3, in TearDown()."; |
| 435 | } |
| 436 | private: |
| 437 | void Deinit() { |
| 438 | FAIL() << "Expected failure #4, in the test fixture d'tor."; |
| 439 | } |
| 440 | }; |
| 441 | |
| 442 | TEST_F(NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest, FailureInSetUp) { |
| 443 | FAIL() << "Expected failure #2, in the test function."; |
| 444 | } |
| 445 | |
| 446 | // Tests fatal failures in SetUp(). |
| 447 | class FatalFailureInSetUpTest : public testing::Test { |
| 448 | protected: |
| 449 | virtual ~FatalFailureInSetUpTest() { |
| 450 | Deinit(); |
| 451 | } |
| 452 | |
| 453 | virtual void SetUp() { |
| 454 | printf("(expecting 3 failures)\n"); |
| 455 | FAIL() << "Expected failure #1, in SetUp()."; |
| 456 | } |
| 457 | |
| 458 | virtual void TearDown() { |
| 459 | FAIL() << "Expected failure #2, in TearDown()."; |
| 460 | } |
| 461 | private: |
| 462 | void Deinit() { |
| 463 | FAIL() << "Expected failure #3, in the test fixture d'tor."; |
| 464 | } |
| 465 | }; |
| 466 | |
| 467 | TEST_F(FatalFailureInSetUpTest, FailureInSetUp) { |
| 468 | FAIL() << "UNEXPECTED failure in the test function. " |
| 469 | << "We should never get here, as SetUp() failed."; |
| 470 | } |
| 471 | |
| 472 | TEST(AddFailureAtTest, MessageContainsSpecifiedFileAndLineNumber) { |
| 473 | ADD_FAILURE_AT("foo.cc", 42) << "Expected failure in foo.cc"; |
| 474 | } |
| 475 | |
| 476 | #if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE |
| 477 | |
| 478 | // A unary function that may die. |
| 479 | void DieIf(bool should_die) { |
| 480 | GTEST_CHECK_(!should_die) << " - death inside DieIf()."; |
| 481 | } |
| 482 | |
| 483 | // Tests running death tests in a multi-threaded context. |
| 484 | |
| 485 | // Used for coordination between the main and the spawn thread. |
| 486 | struct SpawnThreadNotifications { |
| 487 | SpawnThreadNotifications() {} |
| 488 | |
| 489 | Notification spawn_thread_started; |
| 490 | Notification spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate; |
| 491 | |
| 492 | private: |
| 493 | GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(SpawnThreadNotifications); |
| 494 | }; |
| 495 | |
| 496 | // The function to be executed in the thread spawn by the |
| 497 | // MultipleThreads test (below). |
| 498 | static void ThreadRoutine(SpawnThreadNotifications* notifications) { |
| 499 | // Signals the main thread that this thread has started. |
| 500 | notifications->spawn_thread_started.Notify(); |
| 501 | |
| 502 | // Waits for permission to finish from the main thread. |
| 503 | notifications->spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate.WaitForNotification(); |
| 504 | } |
| 505 | |
| 506 | // This is a death-test test, but it's not named with a DeathTest |
| 507 | // suffix. It starts threads which might interfere with later |
| 508 | // death tests, so it must run after all other death tests. |
| 509 | class DeathTestAndMultiThreadsTest : public testing::Test { |
| 510 | protected: |
| 511 | // Starts a thread and waits for it to begin. |
| 512 | virtual void SetUp() { |
| 513 | thread_.reset(new ThreadWithParam<SpawnThreadNotifications*>( |
| 514 | &ThreadRoutine, ¬ifications_, NULL)); |
| 515 | notifications_.spawn_thread_started.WaitForNotification(); |
| 516 | } |
| 517 | // Tells the thread to finish, and reaps it. |
| 518 | // Depending on the version of the thread library in use, |
| 519 | // a manager thread might still be left running that will interfere |
| 520 | // with later death tests. This is unfortunate, but this class |
| 521 | // cleans up after itself as best it can. |
| 522 | virtual void TearDown() { |
| 523 | notifications_.spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate.Notify(); |
| 524 | } |
| 525 | |
| 526 | private: |
| 527 | SpawnThreadNotifications notifications_; |
| 528 | testing::internal::scoped_ptr<ThreadWithParam<SpawnThreadNotifications*> > |
| 529 | thread_; |
| 530 | }; |
| 531 | |
| 532 | #endif // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE |
| 533 | |
| 534 | // The MixedUpTestCaseTest test case verifies that Google Test will fail a |
| 535 | // test if it uses a different fixture class than what other tests in |
| 536 | // the same test case use. It deliberately contains two fixture |
| 537 | // classes with the same name but defined in different namespaces. |
| 538 | |
| 539 | // The MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest test case verifies that |
| 540 | // when the user defines two tests with the same test case name AND |
| 541 | // same test name (but in different namespaces), the second test will |
| 542 | // fail. |
| 543 | |
| 544 | namespace foo { |
| 545 | |
| 546 | class MixedUpTestCaseTest : public testing::Test { |
| 547 | }; |
| 548 | |
| 549 | TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, FirstTestFromNamespaceFoo) {} |
| 550 | TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, SecondTestFromNamespaceFoo) {} |
| 551 | |
| 552 | class MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest : public testing::Test { |
| 553 | }; |
| 554 | |
| 555 | TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest, |
| 556 | TheSecondTestWithThisNameShouldFail) {} |
| 557 | |
| 558 | } // namespace foo |
| 559 | |
| 560 | namespace bar { |
| 561 | |
| 562 | class MixedUpTestCaseTest : public testing::Test { |
| 563 | }; |
| 564 | |
| 565 | // The following two tests are expected to fail. We rely on the |
| 566 | // golden file to check that Google Test generates the right error message. |
| 567 | TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, ThisShouldFail) {} |
| 568 | TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, ThisShouldFailToo) {} |
| 569 | |
| 570 | class MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest : public testing::Test { |
| 571 | }; |
| 572 | |
| 573 | // Expected to fail. We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test |
| 574 | // generates the right error message. |
| 575 | TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest, |
| 576 | TheSecondTestWithThisNameShouldFail) {} |
| 577 | |
| 578 | } // namespace bar |
| 579 | |
| 580 | // The following two test cases verify that Google Test catches the user |
| 581 | // error of mixing TEST and TEST_F in the same test case. The first |
| 582 | // test case checks the scenario where TEST_F appears before TEST, and |
| 583 | // the second one checks where TEST appears before TEST_F. |
| 584 | |
| 585 | class TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case : public testing::Test { |
| 586 | }; |
| 587 | |
| 588 | TEST_F(TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST_F) {} |
| 589 | |
| 590 | // Expected to fail. We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test |
| 591 | // generates the right error message. |
| 592 | TEST(TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTESTAndShouldFail) {} |
| 593 | |
| 594 | class TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case : public testing::Test { |
| 595 | }; |
| 596 | |
| 597 | TEST(TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST) {} |
| 598 | |
| 599 | // Expected to fail. We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test |
| 600 | // generates the right error message. |
| 601 | TEST_F(TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST_FAndShouldFail) { |
| 602 | } |
| 603 | |
| 604 | // Used for testing EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() and EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(). |
| 605 | int global_integer = 0; |
| 606 | |
| 607 | // Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() can reference global variables. |
| 608 | TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, CanReferenceGlobalVariables) { |
| 609 | global_integer = 0; |
| 610 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ |
| 611 | EXPECT_EQ(1, global_integer) << "Expected non-fatal failure."; |
| 612 | }, "Expected non-fatal failure."); |
| 613 | } |
| 614 | |
| 615 | // Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() can reference local variables |
| 616 | // (static or not). |
| 617 | TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, CanReferenceLocalVariables) { |
| 618 | int m = 0; |
| 619 | static int n; |
| 620 | n = 1; |
| 621 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ |
| 622 | EXPECT_EQ(m, n) << "Expected non-fatal failure."; |
| 623 | }, "Expected non-fatal failure."); |
| 624 | } |
| 625 | |
| 626 | // Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() succeeds when there is exactly |
| 627 | // one non-fatal failure and no fatal failure. |
| 628 | TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, SucceedsWhenThereIsOneNonfatalFailure) { |
| 629 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ |
| 630 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure."; |
| 631 | }, "Expected non-fatal failure."); |
| 632 | } |
| 633 | |
| 634 | // Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is no |
| 635 | // non-fatal failure. |
| 636 | TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsNoNonfatalFailure) { |
| 637 | printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
| 638 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ |
| 639 | }, ""); |
| 640 | } |
| 641 | |
| 642 | // Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there are two |
| 643 | // non-fatal failures. |
| 644 | TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereAreTwoNonfatalFailures) { |
| 645 | printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
| 646 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ |
| 647 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure 1."; |
| 648 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure 2."; |
| 649 | }, ""); |
| 650 | } |
| 651 | |
| 652 | // Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is one fatal |
| 653 | // failure. |
| 654 | TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsOneFatalFailure) { |
| 655 | printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
| 656 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ |
| 657 | FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure."; |
| 658 | }, ""); |
| 659 | } |
| 660 | |
| 661 | // Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being |
| 662 | // tested returns. |
| 663 | TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementReturns) { |
| 664 | printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
| 665 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ |
| 666 | return; |
| 667 | }, ""); |
| 668 | } |
| 669 | |
| 670 | #if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS |
| 671 | |
| 672 | // Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being |
| 673 | // tested throws. |
| 674 | TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementThrows) { |
| 675 | printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
| 676 | try { |
| 677 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ |
| 678 | throw 0; |
| 679 | }, ""); |
| 680 | } catch(int) { // NOLINT |
| 681 | } |
| 682 | } |
| 683 | |
| 684 | #endif // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS |
| 685 | |
| 686 | // Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() can reference global variables. |
| 687 | TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, CanReferenceGlobalVariables) { |
| 688 | global_integer = 0; |
| 689 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ |
| 690 | ASSERT_EQ(1, global_integer) << "Expected fatal failure."; |
| 691 | }, "Expected fatal failure."); |
| 692 | } |
| 693 | |
| 694 | // Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() can reference local static |
| 695 | // variables. |
| 696 | TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, CanReferenceLocalStaticVariables) { |
| 697 | static int n; |
| 698 | n = 1; |
| 699 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ |
| 700 | ASSERT_EQ(0, n) << "Expected fatal failure."; |
| 701 | }, "Expected fatal failure."); |
| 702 | } |
| 703 | |
| 704 | // Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() succeeds when there is exactly |
| 705 | // one fatal failure and no non-fatal failure. |
| 706 | TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, SucceedsWhenThereIsOneFatalFailure) { |
| 707 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ |
| 708 | FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure."; |
| 709 | }, "Expected fatal failure."); |
| 710 | } |
| 711 | |
| 712 | // Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is no fatal |
| 713 | // failure. |
| 714 | TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsNoFatalFailure) { |
| 715 | printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
| 716 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ |
| 717 | }, ""); |
| 718 | } |
| 719 | |
| 720 | // A helper for generating a fatal failure. |
| 721 | void FatalFailure() { |
| 722 | FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure."; |
| 723 | } |
| 724 | |
| 725 | // Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there are two |
| 726 | // fatal failures. |
| 727 | TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereAreTwoFatalFailures) { |
| 728 | printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
| 729 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ |
| 730 | FatalFailure(); |
| 731 | FatalFailure(); |
| 732 | }, ""); |
| 733 | } |
| 734 | |
| 735 | // Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is one non-fatal |
| 736 | // failure. |
| 737 | TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsOneNonfatalFailure) { |
| 738 | printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
| 739 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ |
| 740 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure."; |
| 741 | }, ""); |
| 742 | } |
| 743 | |
| 744 | // Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being |
| 745 | // tested returns. |
| 746 | TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementReturns) { |
| 747 | printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
| 748 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ |
| 749 | return; |
| 750 | }, ""); |
| 751 | } |
| 752 | |
| 753 | #if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS |
| 754 | |
| 755 | // Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being |
| 756 | // tested throws. |
| 757 | TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementThrows) { |
| 758 | printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
| 759 | try { |
| 760 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ |
| 761 | throw 0; |
| 762 | }, ""); |
| 763 | } catch(int) { // NOLINT |
| 764 | } |
| 765 | } |
| 766 | |
| 767 | #endif // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS |
| 768 | |
| 769 | // This #ifdef block tests the output of value-parameterized tests. |
| 770 | |
Austin Schuh | 0cbef62 | 2015-09-06 17:34:52 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 771 | std::string ParamNameFunc(const testing::TestParamInfo<std::string>& info) { |
| 772 | return info.param; |
| 773 | } |
| 774 | |
| 775 | class ParamTest : public testing::TestWithParam<std::string> { |
| 776 | }; |
| 777 | |
| 778 | TEST_P(ParamTest, Success) { |
| 779 | EXPECT_EQ("a", GetParam()); |
| 780 | } |
| 781 | |
| 782 | TEST_P(ParamTest, Failure) { |
| 783 | EXPECT_EQ("b", GetParam()) << "Expected failure"; |
| 784 | } |
| 785 | |
| 786 | INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(PrintingStrings, |
| 787 | ParamTest, |
| 788 | testing::Values(std::string("a")), |
| 789 | ParamNameFunc); |
| 790 | |
Austin Schuh | 0cbef62 | 2015-09-06 17:34:52 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 791 | // This #ifdef block tests the output of typed tests. |
| 792 | #if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST |
| 793 | |
| 794 | template <typename T> |
| 795 | class TypedTest : public testing::Test { |
| 796 | }; |
| 797 | |
| 798 | TYPED_TEST_CASE(TypedTest, testing::Types<int>); |
| 799 | |
| 800 | TYPED_TEST(TypedTest, Success) { |
| 801 | EXPECT_EQ(0, TypeParam()); |
| 802 | } |
| 803 | |
| 804 | TYPED_TEST(TypedTest, Failure) { |
| 805 | EXPECT_EQ(1, TypeParam()) << "Expected failure"; |
| 806 | } |
| 807 | |
Austin Schuh | 889ac43 | 2018-10-29 22:57:02 -0700 | [diff] [blame^] | 808 | typedef testing::Types<char, int> TypesForTestWithNames; |
| 809 | |
| 810 | template <typename T> |
| 811 | class TypedTestWithNames : public testing::Test {}; |
| 812 | |
| 813 | class TypedTestNames { |
| 814 | public: |
| 815 | template <typename T> |
| 816 | static std::string GetName(int i) { |
| 817 | if (testing::internal::IsSame<T, char>::value) |
| 818 | return std::string("char") + ::testing::PrintToString(i); |
| 819 | if (testing::internal::IsSame<T, int>::value) |
| 820 | return std::string("int") + ::testing::PrintToString(i); |
| 821 | } |
| 822 | }; |
| 823 | |
| 824 | TYPED_TEST_CASE(TypedTestWithNames, TypesForTestWithNames, TypedTestNames); |
| 825 | |
| 826 | TYPED_TEST(TypedTestWithNames, Success) {} |
| 827 | |
| 828 | TYPED_TEST(TypedTestWithNames, Failure) { FAIL(); } |
| 829 | |
Austin Schuh | 0cbef62 | 2015-09-06 17:34:52 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 830 | #endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST |
| 831 | |
| 832 | // This #ifdef block tests the output of type-parameterized tests. |
| 833 | #if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P |
| 834 | |
| 835 | template <typename T> |
| 836 | class TypedTestP : public testing::Test { |
| 837 | }; |
| 838 | |
| 839 | TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(TypedTestP); |
| 840 | |
| 841 | TYPED_TEST_P(TypedTestP, Success) { |
| 842 | EXPECT_EQ(0U, TypeParam()); |
| 843 | } |
| 844 | |
| 845 | TYPED_TEST_P(TypedTestP, Failure) { |
| 846 | EXPECT_EQ(1U, TypeParam()) << "Expected failure"; |
| 847 | } |
| 848 | |
| 849 | REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(TypedTestP, Success, Failure); |
| 850 | |
| 851 | typedef testing::Types<unsigned char, unsigned int> UnsignedTypes; |
| 852 | INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(Unsigned, TypedTestP, UnsignedTypes); |
| 853 | |
Austin Schuh | 889ac43 | 2018-10-29 22:57:02 -0700 | [diff] [blame^] | 854 | class TypedTestPNames { |
| 855 | public: |
| 856 | template <typename T> |
| 857 | static std::string GetName(int i) { |
| 858 | if (testing::internal::IsSame<T, unsigned char>::value) { |
| 859 | return std::string("unsignedChar") + ::testing::PrintToString(i); |
| 860 | } |
| 861 | if (testing::internal::IsSame<T, unsigned int>::value) { |
| 862 | return std::string("unsignedInt") + ::testing::PrintToString(i); |
| 863 | } |
| 864 | } |
| 865 | }; |
| 866 | |
| 867 | INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(UnsignedCustomName, TypedTestP, UnsignedTypes, |
| 868 | TypedTestPNames); |
| 869 | |
Austin Schuh | 0cbef62 | 2015-09-06 17:34:52 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 870 | #endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P |
| 871 | |
| 872 | #if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST |
| 873 | |
| 874 | // We rely on the golden file to verify that tests whose test case |
| 875 | // name ends with DeathTest are run first. |
| 876 | |
| 877 | TEST(ADeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) { |
| 878 | } |
| 879 | |
| 880 | # if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST |
| 881 | |
| 882 | // We rely on the golden file to verify that typed tests whose test |
| 883 | // case name ends with DeathTest are run first. |
| 884 | |
| 885 | template <typename T> |
| 886 | class ATypedDeathTest : public testing::Test { |
| 887 | }; |
| 888 | |
| 889 | typedef testing::Types<int, double> NumericTypes; |
| 890 | TYPED_TEST_CASE(ATypedDeathTest, NumericTypes); |
| 891 | |
| 892 | TYPED_TEST(ATypedDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) { |
| 893 | } |
| 894 | |
| 895 | # endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST |
| 896 | |
| 897 | # if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P |
| 898 | |
| 899 | |
| 900 | // We rely on the golden file to verify that type-parameterized tests |
| 901 | // whose test case name ends with DeathTest are run first. |
| 902 | |
| 903 | template <typename T> |
| 904 | class ATypeParamDeathTest : public testing::Test { |
| 905 | }; |
| 906 | |
| 907 | TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(ATypeParamDeathTest); |
| 908 | |
| 909 | TYPED_TEST_P(ATypeParamDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) { |
| 910 | } |
| 911 | |
| 912 | REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(ATypeParamDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst); |
| 913 | |
| 914 | INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(My, ATypeParamDeathTest, NumericTypes); |
| 915 | |
| 916 | # endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P |
| 917 | |
| 918 | #endif // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST |
| 919 | |
| 920 | // Tests various failure conditions of |
| 921 | // EXPECT_{,NON}FATAL_FAILURE{,_ON_ALL_THREADS}. |
| 922 | class ExpectFailureTest : public testing::Test { |
| 923 | public: // Must be public and not protected due to a bug in g++ 3.4.2. |
| 924 | enum FailureMode { |
| 925 | FATAL_FAILURE, |
| 926 | NONFATAL_FAILURE |
| 927 | }; |
| 928 | static void AddFailure(FailureMode failure) { |
| 929 | if (failure == FATAL_FAILURE) { |
| 930 | FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure."; |
| 931 | } else { |
| 932 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure."; |
| 933 | } |
| 934 | } |
| 935 | }; |
| 936 | |
| 937 | TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectFatalFailure) { |
| 938 | // Expected fatal failure, but succeeds. |
| 939 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
| 940 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(SUCCEED(), "Expected fatal failure."); |
| 941 | // Expected fatal failure, but got a non-fatal failure. |
| 942 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
| 943 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), "Expected non-fatal " |
| 944 | "failure."); |
| 945 | // Wrong message. |
| 946 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
| 947 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), "Some other fatal failure " |
| 948 | "expected."); |
| 949 | } |
| 950 | |
| 951 | TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectNonFatalFailure) { |
| 952 | // Expected non-fatal failure, but succeeds. |
| 953 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
| 954 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(SUCCEED(), "Expected non-fatal failure."); |
| 955 | // Expected non-fatal failure, but got a fatal failure. |
| 956 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
| 957 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), "Expected fatal failure."); |
| 958 | // Wrong message. |
| 959 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
| 960 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), "Some other non-fatal " |
| 961 | "failure."); |
| 962 | } |
| 963 | |
| 964 | #if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE |
| 965 | |
| 966 | class ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest : public ExpectFailureTest { |
| 967 | protected: |
| 968 | static void AddFailureInOtherThread(FailureMode failure) { |
| 969 | ThreadWithParam<FailureMode> thread(&AddFailure, failure, NULL); |
| 970 | thread.Join(); |
| 971 | } |
| 972 | }; |
| 973 | |
| 974 | TEST_F(ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest, ExpectFatalFailure) { |
| 975 | // We only intercept the current thread. |
| 976 | printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n"); |
| 977 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailureInOtherThread(FATAL_FAILURE), |
| 978 | "Expected fatal failure."); |
| 979 | } |
| 980 | |
| 981 | TEST_F(ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest, ExpectNonFatalFailure) { |
| 982 | // We only intercept the current thread. |
| 983 | printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n"); |
| 984 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailureInOtherThread(NONFATAL_FAILURE), |
| 985 | "Expected non-fatal failure."); |
| 986 | } |
| 987 | |
| 988 | typedef ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporterTest; |
| 989 | |
| 990 | // Tests that the ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter only catches failures from |
| 991 | // the current thread if it is instantiated with INTERCEPT_ONLY_CURRENT_THREAD. |
| 992 | TEST_F(ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporterTest, InterceptOnlyCurrentThread) { |
| 993 | printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n"); |
| 994 | TestPartResultArray results; |
| 995 | { |
| 996 | ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter reporter( |
| 997 | ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter::INTERCEPT_ONLY_CURRENT_THREAD, |
| 998 | &results); |
| 999 | AddFailureInOtherThread(FATAL_FAILURE); |
| 1000 | AddFailureInOtherThread(NONFATAL_FAILURE); |
| 1001 | } |
| 1002 | // The two failures should not have been intercepted. |
| 1003 | EXPECT_EQ(0, results.size()) << "This shouldn't fail."; |
| 1004 | } |
| 1005 | |
| 1006 | #endif // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE |
| 1007 | |
| 1008 | TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectFatalFailureOnAllThreads) { |
| 1009 | // Expected fatal failure, but succeeds. |
| 1010 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
| 1011 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(SUCCEED(), "Expected fatal failure."); |
| 1012 | // Expected fatal failure, but got a non-fatal failure. |
| 1013 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
| 1014 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), |
| 1015 | "Expected non-fatal failure."); |
| 1016 | // Wrong message. |
| 1017 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
| 1018 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), |
| 1019 | "Some other fatal failure expected."); |
| 1020 | } |
| 1021 | |
| 1022 | TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectNonFatalFailureOnAllThreads) { |
| 1023 | // Expected non-fatal failure, but succeeds. |
| 1024 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
| 1025 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(SUCCEED(), "Expected non-fatal " |
| 1026 | "failure."); |
| 1027 | // Expected non-fatal failure, but got a fatal failure. |
| 1028 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
| 1029 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), |
| 1030 | "Expected fatal failure."); |
| 1031 | // Wrong message. |
| 1032 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
| 1033 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), |
| 1034 | "Some other non-fatal failure."); |
| 1035 | } |
| 1036 | |
| 1037 | |
| 1038 | // Two test environments for testing testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(). |
| 1039 | |
| 1040 | class FooEnvironment : public testing::Environment { |
| 1041 | public: |
| 1042 | virtual void SetUp() { |
| 1043 | printf("%s", "FooEnvironment::SetUp() called.\n"); |
| 1044 | } |
| 1045 | |
| 1046 | virtual void TearDown() { |
| 1047 | printf("%s", "FooEnvironment::TearDown() called.\n"); |
| 1048 | FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure."; |
| 1049 | } |
| 1050 | }; |
| 1051 | |
| 1052 | class BarEnvironment : public testing::Environment { |
| 1053 | public: |
| 1054 | virtual void SetUp() { |
| 1055 | printf("%s", "BarEnvironment::SetUp() called.\n"); |
| 1056 | } |
| 1057 | |
| 1058 | virtual void TearDown() { |
| 1059 | printf("%s", "BarEnvironment::TearDown() called.\n"); |
| 1060 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure."; |
| 1061 | } |
| 1062 | }; |
| 1063 | |
| 1064 | // The main function. |
| 1065 | // |
| 1066 | // The idea is to use Google Test to run all the tests we have defined (some |
| 1067 | // of them are intended to fail), and then compare the test results |
| 1068 | // with the "golden" file. |
| 1069 | int main(int argc, char **argv) { |
| 1070 | testing::GTEST_FLAG(print_time) = false; |
| 1071 | |
| 1072 | // We just run the tests, knowing some of them are intended to fail. |
| 1073 | // We will use a separate Python script to compare the output of |
| 1074 | // this program with the golden file. |
| 1075 | |
| 1076 | // It's hard to test InitGoogleTest() directly, as it has many |
| 1077 | // global side effects. The following line serves as a sanity test |
| 1078 | // for it. |
| 1079 | testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); |
| 1080 | bool internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests = |
| 1081 | std::count(argv, argv + argc, |
| 1082 | std::string("internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests")) > 0; |
| 1083 | |
| 1084 | #if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST |
| 1085 | if (testing::internal::GTEST_FLAG(internal_run_death_test) != "") { |
| 1086 | // Skip the usual output capturing if we're running as the child |
| 1087 | // process of an threadsafe-style death test. |
| 1088 | # if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS |
| 1089 | posix::FReopen("nul:", "w", stdout); |
| 1090 | # else |
| 1091 | posix::FReopen("/dev/null", "w", stdout); |
| 1092 | # endif // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS |
| 1093 | return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); |
| 1094 | } |
| 1095 | #endif // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST |
| 1096 | |
| 1097 | if (internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests) |
| 1098 | return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); |
| 1099 | |
| 1100 | // Registers two global test environments. |
| 1101 | // The golden file verifies that they are set up in the order they |
| 1102 | // are registered, and torn down in the reverse order. |
| 1103 | testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(new FooEnvironment); |
| 1104 | testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(new BarEnvironment); |
Austin Schuh | 889ac43 | 2018-10-29 22:57:02 -0700 | [diff] [blame^] | 1105 | #if _MSC_VER |
| 1106 | GTEST_DISABLE_MSC_WARNINGS_POP_() // 4127 |
| 1107 | #endif // _MSC_VER |
Austin Schuh | 0cbef62 | 2015-09-06 17:34:52 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 1108 | return RunAllTests(); |
| 1109 | } |