Squashed 'third_party/protobuf/' content from commit e35e248
Change-Id: I6cbe123d09fe50fdcad0e51466665daeee7433c7
git-subtree-dir: third_party/protobuf
git-subtree-split: e35e24800fb8d694bdeea5fd63dc7d1b14d68723
diff --git a/csharp/protos/unittest_issues.proto b/csharp/protos/unittest_issues.proto
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..989b3dc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/csharp/protos/unittest_issues.proto
@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
+syntax = "proto3";
+
+// These proto descriptors have at one time been reported as an issue or defect.
+// They are kept here to replicate the issue, and continue to verify the fix.
+
+// Issue: Non-"Google.Protobuffers" namespace will ensure that protobuffer library types are qualified
+option csharp_namespace = "UnitTest.Issues.TestProtos";
+
+package unittest_issues;
+option optimize_for = SPEED;
+
+// Issue 307: when generating doubly-nested types, any references
+// should be of the form A.Types.B.Types.C.
+message Issue307 {
+ message NestedOnce {
+ message NestedTwice {
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+// Old issue 13: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=13
+// New issue 309: https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/309
+
+// message A {
+// optional int32 _A = 1;
+// }
+
+// message B {
+// optional int32 B_ = 1;
+// }
+
+//message AB {
+// optional int32 a_b = 1;
+//}
+
+// Similar issue with numeric names
+// Java code failed too, so probably best for this to be a restriction.
+// See https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/308
+// message NumberField {
+// optional int32 _01 = 1;
+// }
+
+// issue 19 - negative enum values
+
+enum NegativeEnum {
+ NEGATIVE_ENUM_ZERO = 0;
+ FiveBelow = -5;
+ MinusOne = -1;
+}
+
+message NegativeEnumMessage {
+ NegativeEnum value = 1;
+ repeated NegativeEnum values = 2 [packed = false];
+ repeated NegativeEnum packed_values = 3 [packed=true];
+}
+
+// Issue 21: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=21
+// Decorate fields with [deprecated=true] as [System.Obsolete]
+
+message DeprecatedChild {
+}
+
+enum DeprecatedEnum {
+ DEPRECATED_ZERO = 0;
+ one = 1;
+}
+
+message DeprecatedFieldsMessage {
+ int32 PrimitiveValue = 1 [deprecated = true];
+ repeated int32 PrimitiveArray = 2 [deprecated = true];
+
+ DeprecatedChild MessageValue = 3 [deprecated = true];
+ repeated DeprecatedChild MessageArray = 4 [deprecated = true];
+
+ DeprecatedEnum EnumValue = 5 [deprecated = true];
+ repeated DeprecatedEnum EnumArray = 6 [deprecated = true];
+}
+
+// Issue 45: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=45
+message ItemField {
+ int32 item = 1;
+}
+
+message ReservedNames {
+ // Force a nested type called Types
+ message SomeNestedType {
+ }
+
+ int32 types = 1;
+ int32 descriptor = 2;
+}
+
+message TestJsonFieldOrdering {
+ // These fields are deliberately not declared in numeric
+ // order, and the oneof fields aren't contiguous either.
+ // This allows for reasonably robust tests of JSON output
+ // ordering.
+ // TestFieldOrderings in unittest_proto3.proto is similar,
+ // but doesn't include oneofs.
+ // TODO: Consider adding oneofs to TestFieldOrderings, although
+ // that will require fixing other tests in multiple platforms.
+ // Alternatively, consider just adding this to
+ // unittest_proto3.proto if multiple platforms want it.
+
+ int32 plain_int32 = 4;
+
+ oneof o1 {
+ string o1_string = 2;
+ int32 o1_int32 = 5;
+ }
+
+ string plain_string = 1;
+
+ oneof o2 {
+ int32 o2_int32 = 6;
+ string o2_string = 3;
+ }
+
+}
\ No newline at end of file